Mercedes Ml vs Range Rover Sport

Trying to figure out which of these cars to buy? We compare the difference between the Mercedes Ml vs Range Rover Sport to make an informed buying decision as to which car to buy in 2020. This comparison has been carried out on the basis of prices, engine specifications, mileage, and features of these cars.

Mercedes Ml vs Range Rover Sport

Compare 2014 Land Rover Range Rover Sport vs 2014 Mercedes-Benz M Class

2014 Land Rover Range Rover Sport2014 Mercedes-Benz M ClassAdd Vehicle
2014 Land Rover Range Rover Sport2014 Mercedes-Benz M ClassAdd Vehicle
Select style4WD 4-Door AutomaticbiographySelect style4MATIC 4-Door ML 350
 Show Only Differences
Pricing
Invoice Price
$85,441$46,770
Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price
$92,400$50,290
Monthly Payment Estimate
$1540 / month$838 / month
The Car Connection’s Take
TCC Rating
TCC’s Bottom Line
The 2014 Land Rover Range Rover Sport has the most convincing answer to the sporty-SUV conundrum.For active families who need to tow a boat or occasionally head off-pavement–but don’t need a third row–the 2014 Mercedes-Benz ML is an excellence vehicle choice.
TCC Likes
Crisp styling blends Range Rover, EvoqueRorty supercharged V-6, thundering supercharged V-8Serene, stately cabinQuiet, comfortable rideStrong, efficient BlueTec dieselExtensive list of tech options
TCC Dislikes
Big jump from base to Autobiography”+2″ seating is only for kids, only for very short tripsNo hybrid or diesel option–yetConservative exteriorIndecisive shifts (Bluetec)COMAND interface
Fuel Economy
City
14 mpg17 mpg
Highway
19 mpg22 mpg
Vehicle
EPA Classification
Standard Sport Utility Vehicles 4WDStandard Sport Utility Vehicles 4WD
Interior Dimensions
Front Shoulder Room (in)
60.758.5
Passenger Capacity
55
Second Leg Room (in)
3738.4
Front Leg Room (in)
42.240.3
Second Head Room (in)
39.138.5
Second Shoulder Room (in)
59.558.4
Front Head Room (in)
39.540.4
Exterior Dimensions
Min Ground Clearance (in)
7.9
Length, Overall (in)
191189.1
Height, Overall (in)
70.170.7
Track Width, Rear (in)
66.365.2
Wheelbase (in)
115.1114.8
Width, Max w/o mirrors (in)
78.175.8
Track Width, Front (in)
66.564.7
Cargo Area Dimensions
Cargo Box (Area) Height (in)
30.2
Cargo Volume to Seat 2 (ft³)
27.738.2
Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 2 (in)
41.1
Cargo Box Width @ Wheelhousings (in)
44
Cargo Volume to Seat 1 (ft³)
62.280.3
Cargo Area Length @ Floor to Seat 1 (in)
73.7
Cargo Volume to Seat 3 (ft³)
27.738.2
Cargo Area Width @ Beltline (in)
50.6
Brakes
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness (in)
1513
Drum – Rear (Yes or )
NANA
Brake ABS System
4-Wheel4-Wheel
Disc – Rear (Yes or )
YesYes
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness (in)
14.412.8
Brake Type
4-Wheel Disc4-Wheel Disc
Rear Drum Diam x Width (in)
NANA
Disc – Front (Yes or )
YesYes
Fuel Tank
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx (gal)
27.724.6
Steering
Turning Diameter – Curb to Curb (ft)
39.738.7
Steering Type
Rack-PinionRack-Pinion
Tires
Front Tire Size
P275/45WR21P255/50HR19
Spare Tire Size
CompactCompact
Front Tire Order Code
NANA
Spare Tire Order Code
NANA
Rear Tire Size
P275/45WR21P255/50HR19
Rear Tire Order Code
NANA
Trailering
Wt Distributing Hitch – Max Tongue Wt. (lbs)
772720
Dead Weight Hitch – Max Trailer Wt. (lbs)
77167200
Wt Distributing Hitch – Max Trailer Wt. (lbs)
77167200
Maximum Trailering Capacity (lbs)
77167200
Dead Weight Hitch – Max Tongue Wt. (lbs)
772720
Weight Information
Base Curb Weight (lbs)
50934751
Wheels
Spare Wheel Size (in)
CompactCompact
Rear Wheel Material
AluminumAluminum
Rear Wheel Size (in)
21 X 9.519 X 8
Front Wheel Material
AluminumAluminum
Spare Wheel Material
SteelSteel
Front Wheel Size (in)
21 X 9.519 X 8
Engine
Fuel System
Gasoline Direct InjectionGasoline Direct Injection
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
461 @ 2500273 @ 3500
Engine Order Code
NANA
Displacement
5.0 L/3053.5 L/213
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
510 @ 6000302 @ 6500
Engine Type
Intercooled Supercharger Premium Unleaded V-8Premium Unleaded V-6
Mileage
EPA Fuel Economy Est – City (MPG)
1417
Fuel Economy Est-Combined (MPG)
1619
EPA Fuel Economy Est – Hwy (MPG)
1922
Transmission
Trans Description Cont.
Automatic w/ODAutomatic w/OD
Eighth Gear Ratio (:1)
0.67
Drivetrain
Four Wheel DriveAll Wheel
Sixth Gear Ratio (:1)
1.000.82
First Gear Ratio (:1)
4.704.38
Third Gear Ratio (:1)
2.101.92
Trans Type
87
Seventh Gear Ratio (:1)
0.840.73
Fifth Gear Ratio (:1)
1.291.00
Trans Description Cont. Again
NANA
Reverse Ratio (:1)
3.323.42
Second Gear Ratio (:1)
3.132.86
Trans Order Code
NANA
Fourth Gear Ratio (:1)
1.671.37
Final Drive Axle Ratio (:1)
3.90
Summary
Body Style
Sport Utility4MATIC
Vehicle Name
Land Rover Range Rover SportMercedes-Benz M-Class
Suspension
Suspension Type – Front (Cont.)
Double WishboneDouble Wishbone
Suspension Type – Rear
Multi-LinkMulti-Link
Suspension Type – Rear (Cont.)
Multi-LinkMulti-Link
Suspension Type – Front
Double WishboneDouble Wishbone
Emissions
Tons/yr of CO2 Emissions @ 15K mi/year
11.39.6 (Est)
EPA Greenhouse Gas Score
4.0 (Est)
Electrical
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary)
600
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps)
180
Crash Test Ratings
Overall Rating

Leave a Comment