Range Rover Sport vs Land cruiser v8

Trying to figure out which of these cars to buy? We compare the Range Rover sport vs Porsche cayenne 2018, and land cruiser vs range rover to make an informed buying decision as to which car to buy in 2020. This comparison has been carried out on the basis of prices, engine specifications, mileage, and features of these cars.

Range Rover Sport vs Land cruiser v8

2020 LAND ROVER RANGE ROVER VS. 2019 TOYOTA LAND CRUISER

5 passengers

Seating Capacity8 passengers31.8 cubic feet

Cargo Space (Rear Seats Up)16.1 cubic feet7,716 pounds

Maximum Towing Capacity8,100 pounds5 trims

Number of Trim Levels1 trim355 hp 3.0L MHEV V6

Base Engine381 hp 5.7L V8 engine557 hp 5.0L supercharged V8

Top Enginen/a



Rumson who want a high-end SUV that can handle any on or off-road conditions can compare the 2020 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2019 Toyota Land Cruiser. Take a look at performance features and space to help decide which one is right for you,

RANGE ROVER OR LAND CRUISER: INTERIOR DIMENSIONS

The five-passenger Range Rover interior has fewer seats and more wiggle room and cargo capacity than the Land Cruiser, as well as both standard and long wheelbase options. You can also choose a hyper-luxurious four-passenger option with the Rear Executive Class Seats, which include features like heated and cooled rear seats with a massage function.

  • Head Room w/ Standard Wheelbase (Front / Rear) — 39.5 inches / 39.4 inches
  • Head Room w/ Long Wheelbase (Front / Rear) — 39.1 inches / 39.0 inches
  • Cargo Space (Rear Seats Up) — 31.8 cubic feet
  • Length x Width x Height — 196.9 inches L (204.4 inches w/ Long Wheelbase) x 81.6 inches W x 73.6 inches H

Do you have a large family or carpooling needs? The 8-passenger Toyota Land Cruiser might be the right choice for you:

  • Head Room (Front / Rear) — 38.3 inches / 38.9 inches
  • Cargo Space (Rear Seats Up) — 16.1 cubic feet
  • Length x Width x Height — 194.9 inches L x 78.0 inches W x 74.0 inches H

land cruiser vs range rover: ENGINE SPECS

In a Range Rover vs. Land Cruiser comparison, they match up with both an 8-speed shiftable automatic transmission and four-wheel drive for better off-roading, but the 2020 Range Rover has more engine options to choose from:

The Range Rover has 7,716 pounds maximum towing capacity as well as fuel economy-friendly options like a plug-in hybrid (PHEV), mild hybrid (MHEV), and diesel engine:

  • 3.0L V6 MHEV engine — 355 hp and 365 lb-ft of torque
  • 3.0L V6 turbodiesel engine — 254 hp and 443 lb-ft of torque
  • 3.0L V6 MHEV engine — 395 hp and 406 lb-ft of torque
  • 2.0L 4-cylinder PHEV engine — 398 hp and 472 lb-ft of torque
  • 5.0L supercharged V8 engine — 518 hp and 461 lb-ft of torque
  • 5.0L supercharged V8 engine — 557 hp and 516 lb-ft of torque

The 2019 Toyota Land Cruiser more towing power at up to 8,100 pounds, but you can only choose one trim level and one engine:

  • 5.7L V8 engine with Direct Injection — 381 horsepower and 401 lb-ft of torque
The 2019 Land Rover Range Rover Sport climbs to the peak of the luxury-SUV niche with its tasteful looks and exceptional performance.The 2019 Toyota Land Cruiser’s go-anywhere capability makes it a cult favorite, but most buyers are better suited to rivals.
TCC Likes
Supreme comfortCapability on or off roadUnderstated and gorgeous styleThe myth, the truck, the legendWill climb over anythingAmple power
TCC Dislikes
Very expensiveOnly one fuel-efficient powertrainSmall third rowGuzzles fuelVery expensiveGuzzles fuel
Fuel Economy
City
0 mpg13 mpg
Highway
0 mpg18 mpg
Interior Dimensions
Second Leg Room (in)
3734.4
Passenger Capacity
58
Front Leg Room (in)
42.242.9
Second Head Room (in)
39.138.9
Second Shoulder Room (in)
59.561.1
Front Head Room (in)
39.538.3
Front Shoulder Room (in)
60.761
Third Hip Room (in)
56.6
Third Head Room (in)
35.8
Front Hip Room (in)
59.4
Third Shoulder Room (in)
62.3
Second Hip Room (in)
58.6
Third Leg Room (in)
28.3
Exterior Dimensions
Track Width, Rear (in)
66.364.7
Wheelbase (in)
115112.2
Width, Max w/o mirrors (in)
78.178
Track Width, Front (in)
66.564.9
Min Ground Clearance (in)
7.98.9
Length, Overall (in)
192.1194.9
Height, Overall (in)
7174
Cargo Area Dimensions
Cargo Volume to Seat 2 (ft³)
24.843
Cargo Volume to Seat 3 (ft³)
24.816.1
Cargo Volume to Seat 1 (ft³)
81.7
Brakes
Disc – Rear (Yes or )
YesYes
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness (in)
14.413.6
Brake ABS System
4-Wheel4-Wheel
Rear Drum Diam x Width (in)
NANA
Disc – Front (Yes or )
YesYes
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness (in)
1513.9
Brake Type
4-Wheel Disc4-Wheel Disc
Drum – Rear (Yes or )
NANA
Brake ABS System (Second Line)
4-Wheel4-Wheel
Fuel Tank
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx (gal)
24.124.6
Steering
Turning Diameter – Curb to Curb (ft)
40.638.7
Steering Type
Rack-PinionRack-Pinion
Tires
Front Tire Size
P255/55YR20P285/60VR18
Spare Tire Size
NAFull-Size
Front Tire Order Code
NANA
Spare Tire Order Code
NANA
Rear Tire Size
P255/55YR20P285/60VR18
Rear Tire Order Code
NANA
Trailering
Wt Distributing Hitch – Max Tongue Wt. (lbs)
551810
Dead Weight Hitch – Max Trailer Wt. (lbs)
55118100
Wt Distributing Hitch – Max Trailer Wt. (lbs)
55118100
Maximum Trailering Capacity (lbs)
55118100
Dead Weight Hitch – Max Tongue Wt. (lbs)
551810
Wheels
Spare Wheel Size (in)
NAFull-Size
Rear Wheel Material
AluminumAluminum
Rear Wheel Size (in)
20 X 9.518 X 8
Front Wheel Material
AluminumAluminum
Spare Wheel Material
NAAluminum
Front Wheel Size (in)
20 X 9.518 X 8
Engine
Fuel System
Gasoline Direct InjectionSequential MPI
Engine Oil Cooler
Regular DutyRegular Duty
SAE Net Torque @ RPM
472 @ 1500401 @ 3600
Engine Order Code
NANA
Displacement
2.0 L/1225.7 L/346
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM
398 @ 5500381 @ 5600
Engine Type
Intercooled Turbo Gas/Electric I-4Regular Unleaded V-8
Mileage
Battery Range (mi)
19
EPA MPG Equivalent – Combined
42
Fuel Economy Est-Combined (MPG)
1915
EPA Fuel Economy Est – Hwy (MPG)
18
EPA Fuel Economy Est – City (MPG)
13
Transmission
Transfer Case Model
ElectronicElectronic
Fourth Gear Ratio (:1)
1.671.43
Trans Description Cont.
Automatic w/ODAutomatic w/OD
Eighth Gear Ratio (:1)
0.670.67
Sixth Gear Ratio (:1)
1.001.00
First Gear Ratio (:1)
4.714.79
Trans PTO Access
NoNo
Third Gear Ratio (:1)
2.111.84
Trans Type
88
Seventh Gear Ratio (:1)
0.840.82
Drivetrain
Four Wheel DriveFour Wheel Drive
Transfer Case Power Take Off
NoNo
Fifth Gear Ratio (:1)
1.281.21
Trans Description Cont. Again
NANA
Reverse Ratio (:1)
3.323.79
Second Gear Ratio (:1)
3.142.81
Trans Order Code
NANA
Summary
Body Code
SS
Body Style
PHEVSport Utility
Vehicle Name
Land Rover Range Rover SportToyota Land Cruiser
Suspension
Axle Type – Front
IndependentIndependent
Axle Ratio (:1) – Front
3.733.31
Suspension Type – Rear
Multi-LinkMulti-Link
Axle Type – Rear
IndependentRigid Axle
Axle Ratio (:1) – Rear
3.733.31
Suspension Type – Front
Double WishboneDouble Wishbone
Weight Information
Gross Vehicle Weight Rating Cap (lbs)
7385

Leave a Comment