Trying to figure out which of these cars to buy? We compare theRange Rover vs Cayenne 2019, range rover vs porsche cayenne 2020 and range rover sport vs porsche cayenne 2020 to make an informed buying decision as to which car to buy in 2020. This comparison has been carried out on the basis of prices, engine specifications, mileage, and features of these cars.
Range Rover vs Cayenne 2019
Compare 2019 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2019 Porsche Cayenne
| 2019 Land Rover Range Rover | 2019 Porsche Cayenne | Add Vehicle |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 Land Rover Range Rover | 2019 Porsche Cayenne | Add Vehicle |
|---|---|---|
| Select stylePHEV HSE | Select styleAWD | |
| Show Only Differences | ||
| Pricing | ||
| Invoice Price | ||
| $90,193 | N/A | |
| Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price | ||
| $95,950 | $65,700 | |
| Monthly Payment Estimate | ||
| $1599 / month | $1095 / month | |
| The Car Connection’s Take | ||
| TCC Rating | ||
| TCC’s Bottom Line | ||
| The 2019 Land Rover Range Rover is no longer peak ultra-luxury SUV, but it’s still the purist’s best British choice. | The 2019 Porsche Cayenne twists performance DNA with a strand of off-road talent, and bridges the gap between “Porsche” and “SUV” perfectly. | |
| TCC Likes | ||
| Astounding capability regardless of terrainExceptional on-road ride and handlingImpressive engine lineup | Yes, performance; yes, SUVSmart interior ditches pounds of buttonsAll the custom touches | |
| TCC Dislikes | ||
| Dual touchscreens’ learning curveEye-watering priceDesign is beginning to show its age | Tech wizardry aside, still a big SUVRide, steering can be too stiffOh wow, check out the prices | |
| Fuel Economy | ||
| City | ||
| 0 mpg | 19 mpg | |
| Highway | ||
| 0 mpg | 23 mpg | |
| Interior Dimensions | ||
| Second Head Room (in) | ||
| 39.2 | – | |
| Second Shoulder Room (in) | ||
| 59.4 | – | |
| Passenger Capacity | ||
| 5 | 5 | |
| Front Head Room (in) | ||
| 39.3 | – | |
| Front Shoulder Room (in) | ||
| 60.7 | – | |
| Second Leg Room (in) | ||
| 40.2 | – | |
| Front Leg Room (in) | ||
| 42.5 | – | |
| Exterior Dimensions | ||
| Width, Max w/o mirrors (in) | ||
| 78.1 | 78 | |
| Track Width, Front (in) | ||
| 66.6 | 66.1 | |
| Min Ground Clearance (in) | ||
| 8.7 | NA | |
| Length, Overall (in) | ||
| 196.9 | 193.6 | |
| Height, Overall (in) | ||
| 73.6 | 66.7 | |
| Track Width, Rear (in) | ||
| 66.3 | 65.8 | |
| Wheelbase (in) | ||
| 115 | 113.9 | |
| Cargo Area Dimensions | ||
| Cargo Volume to Seat 2 (ft³) | ||
| 28.3 | 27.2 | |
| Cargo Volume to Seat 3 (ft³) | ||
| 28.3 | 27.2 | |
| Cargo Volume to Seat 1 (ft³) | ||
| – | 60.3 | |
| Brakes | ||
| Brake ABS System | ||
| 4-Wheel | 4-Wheel | |
| Rear Drum Diam x Width (in) | ||
| NA | NA | |
| Disc – Front (Yes or ) | ||
| Yes | Yes | |
| Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness (in) | ||
| 15 | 13.8 | |
| Brake Type | ||
| 4-Wheel Disc | 4-Wheel Disc | |
| Drum – Rear (Yes or ) | ||
| NA | NA | |
| Brake ABS System (Second Line) | ||
| 4-Wheel | 4-Wheel | |
| Disc – Rear (Yes or ) | ||
| Yes | Yes | |
| Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness (in) | ||
| 14.4 | 13 | |
| Fuel Tank | ||
| Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx (gal) | ||
| 23.8 | 23.7 | |
| Steering | ||
| Steering Type | ||
| Rack-Pinion | Rack-Pinion | |
| Turning Diameter – Curb to Curb (ft) | ||
| 40.5 | 39.7 | |
| Tires | ||
| Spare Tire Size | ||
| NA | NA | |
| Front Tire Order Code | ||
| NA | NA | |
| Spare Tire Order Code | ||
| NA | NA | |
| Rear Tire Size | ||
| P255/50WR20 | P275/50VR19 | |
| Rear Tire Order Code | ||
| NA | NA | |
| Front Tire Size | ||
| P255/50WR20 | P255/55VR19 | |
| Trailering | ||
| Dead Weight Hitch – Max Trailer Wt. (lbs) | ||
| 5511 | 7700 | |
| Wt Distributing Hitch – Max Trailer Wt. (lbs) | ||
| 5511 | 7700 | |
| Maximum Trailering Capacity (lbs) | ||
| 5511 | 7700 | |
| Dead Weight Hitch – Max Tongue Wt. (lbs) | ||
| 551 | 770 | |
| Wt Distributing Hitch – Max Tongue Wt. (lbs) | ||
| 551 | 770 | |
| Weight Information | ||
| Gross Vehicle Weight Rating Cap (lbs) | ||
| 7077 | 6239 | |
| Wheels | ||
| Rear Wheel Material | ||
| Aluminum | Aluminum | |
| Rear Wheel Size (in) | ||
| 20 X 8.5 | 19 X 9.5 | |
| Front Wheel Material | ||
| Aluminum | Aluminum | |
| Spare Wheel Material | ||
| NA | NA | |
| Front Wheel Size (in) | ||
| 20 X 8.5 | 19 X 8.5 | |
| Spare Wheel Size (in) | ||
| NA | NA | |
| Engine | ||
| SAE Net Torque @ RPM | ||
| 472 | 332 @ 1340 | |
| Engine Order Code | ||
| NA | NA | |
| Displacement | ||
| 2.0 L/122 | 3.0 L/183 | |
| SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM | ||
| 398 @ 5500 | 335 @ 5300 | |
| Engine Type | ||
| Intercooled Turbo Gas/Electric I-4 | Intercooled Turbo Premium Unleaded V-6 | |
| Fuel System | ||
| Gasoline Direct Injection | Gasoline Direct Injection | |
| Engine Oil Cooler | ||
| Regular Duty | None | |
| Mileage | ||
| Battery Range (mi) | ||
| 19 | – | |
| EPA MPG Equivalent – Combined | ||
| 42 | – | |
| Fuel Economy Est-Combined (MPG) | ||
| 19 | 21 | |
| EPA Fuel Economy Est – City (MPG) | ||
| – | 19 | |
| EPA Fuel Economy Est – Hwy (MPG) | ||
| – | 23 | |
| Transmission | ||
| First Gear Ratio (:1) | ||
| 4.71 | 5.00 | |
| Trans PTO Access | ||
| No | No | |
| Third Gear Ratio (:1) | ||
| 2.11 | 2.14 | |
| Trans Type | ||
| 8 | 8 | |
| Seventh Gear Ratio (:1) | ||
| 0.84 | 0.82 | |
| Transfer Case Power Take Off | ||
| No | No | |
| Fifth Gear Ratio (:1) | ||
| 1.28 | 1.31 | |
| Trans Description Cont. Again | ||
| NA | NA | |
| Reverse Ratio (:1) | ||
| 3.32 | 3.48 | |
| Second Gear Ratio (:1) | ||
| 3.14 | 3.20 | |
| Trans Order Code | ||
| NA | G1G | |
| Drivetrain | ||
| Four Wheel Drive | All Wheel | |
| Transfer Case Model | ||
| Electronic | None | |
| Fourth Gear Ratio (:1) | ||
| 1.67 | 1.72 | |
| Trans Description Cont. | ||
| Automatic w/OD | Automatic w/OD | |
| Eighth Gear Ratio (:1) | ||
| 0.67 | 0.64 | |
| Sixth Gear Ratio (:1) | ||
| 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| Summary | ||
| Body Code | ||
| S | S | |
| Body Style | ||
| Hybrid | Sport Utility | |
| Vehicle Name | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover | Porsche Cayenne | |
| Suspension | ||
| Suspension Type – Rear | ||
| Multi-Link | Multi-Link | |
| Axle Type – Rear | ||
| Independent | Independent | |
| Axle Ratio (:1) – Rear | ||
| 3.73 | 3.48 | |
| Suspension Type – Front | ||
| Double Wishbone | Multi-Link | |
| Axle Type – Front | ||
| Independent | Independent | |
| Axle Ratio (:1) – Front | ||
| 3.73 | 3.48 | |
| Emissions | ||
| Tons/yr of CO2 Emissions @ 15K mi/year | ||
| – | 8.5 |
